If lives or city property are in danger, trucks will likely still respond
By Lauren Brown
Burns Times-Herald
The Burns City Council voted to cease fire response outside the city limits (with a few exceptions) at the Dec. 10 meeting.
Fire Chief and Interim City Manager Bill Guindon said that if a fire was reported in which structures pertinent to city interests are in danger, or someone’s life is at stake, the department could still respond. Whether the city responds outside the city limits will be at the fire chief’s discretion.
Guindon was quick to point out that this decision does not mean that residents living outside the city limits should assume that the city will respond if there is a fire at their residence.
This has been a prominent issue during the last couple of years as the City of Burns threatened to stop fire response outside the city limits in the fall of 2007. However, in response to concerned county residents, the city extended the deadline to June 30 to give county residents time to start the formation of a fire protection district.
A committee of county residents formed to get all the paperwork in place to put a fire protection district proposal before the voters in the November election. Committee Chairman Phil Kessinger was forced to pull the proposal from ballot consideration in June when he found out the Hines and Burns fire departments would not travel more than five miles outside the city limits. Because the fire departments were unable to cover the entire proposed district, it would have been illegal to put the proposed district on the ballot.
As a result, the committee was back to square one, and the Burns City Council agreed to extend the fire response deadline until Dec. 31 as long as the committee continued to make progress.
At the Dec. 10 city council meeting, Burns Fire Chief and Interim City Manager Guindon presented the council with a letter from the fire district formation committee, which stated that they were pursuing legislative active and other fire protection options.
“The committee is really no further than they were,” Guindon said. “They’re not in a position to move forward at this time.”
In discussion regarding the decision, Councilor Craig LaFollette said that the council really needs to take the city taxpayers into account. “There does come a point where we say we’ve extended this as long as we can,” he said.
Mayor Laura Van Cleave stated that she knew young families living just outside the city limits whose homes were financially tied to having fire insurance, which of course is directly tied to the city’s outside fire response policy. “People are actually impacted by the decision we make,” she said.
“It’s terribly unfortunate,” responded Councilor LaFollette, but he went on to say that ultimately the city isn’t responsible to people living outside the city limits. He said their responsibility lies with taxpaying citizens of Burns.
Councilor Darwin Johnson said that he hoped that even if the city fire department can’t cover the whole county, that perhaps the city would consider having contracts with those near enough to the city limits who would benefit from fire coverage. He reminded the council that Hines currently has fire contracts with people outside its city limits as does Vale.
Councilor Dan Hoke agreed with Johnson and asked if the city had considered offering contracts to people within a two-mile radius of the city limits.
Guindon said he really didn’t feel that contracts were a good idea. “Just because an entity does it doesn’t mean it’s right,” he said. He noted that the city is still liable any time the fire truck leaves the city limits.
Councilor Linda Johnson moved to accept Guindon’s recommendation to suspend fire coverage outside the city limits. Councilor LaFollette seconded the motion.
Councilor Bill Renwick restated that while the city is technically suspending coverage, the fire department will respond if lives or structures important to city business are in danger. He also wanted to add that the city still needs to work with the state on legislation to improve the billing structure for fires in rural areas.
The motion was approved with councilors Hoke, Linda Johnson, Renwick and LaFollette voting in favor and Mayor Van Cleave and Councilor Darwin Johnson voting against.